Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 02:39 AM 10/7/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote: > > > At 02:03 AM 10/6/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote: > > > > > How long do you think it takes to do a thorough examination of an IP > > > portfolio with tens of thousands of items in it, to be able to > > declare with > > > any kind of competence that there is no conflict that needs to > > be declared? > >Words above were written by Ann Navarro, not me. Frankly, I fail to see why >Ann is making these pointless arguments. My point is that many of the "proposals" here have been hopelessly naive, or are exact duplicates of what conditions the W3C *has* been operating under, which haven't prevented the problems we're currently facing. It's very noble to say "if there's a claim holder that won't grant an RF license, the body won't recognize it as a standard". I just won't hold my breath waiting for it to happen. Ann Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc. http://www.webgeek.com/ What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hooya waling waling wi tiyil!
|
