[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL

• From: Tony.Coates@r...
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 11:21:07 +0100

On 06/10/2001 06:44:24 Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>So
>  1) Use any application-specific over-riding catalog (e.g. a cache)
>  2) Use any catalog that comes with document
>  3) Use any document hints (e.g. schema location):
>  4) Use a RDDL document at namespace URI
>  5) Use any resource at the namespace URI (if it is the resource you are
>looking for)
>  6) Use any built-in default catalog
>  7) Report to the user or use some default behaviour

My RDDL documents contain references to the multiple XML Schemas which use the namespace with the URI at which the RDDL document was found.  I think you need to take account of the fact that RDDL documents may reference multiple Schemas, so that an extra process of selection may be required.

     Cheers,
          Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
(1) Content Distribution Architect - Project Gazelle
(2) Leader of XML Architecture & Design - Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
Tony.Coates@r...
========



-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

• Prev by Date: Re: schema trouble
• Next by Date: Re: schema trouble
• Previous by thread: Re: schema trouble
• Next by thread: Reminder: OASIS Topic Maps Published Subjects TC Call ForParticipation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread