[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:38:08 -0400

At 06:40 PM 10/15/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>Ann Navarro wrote:
> > I don't represent "HTML writers".  I am an invited expert, my company is
> > WebGeek, Inc.
>
>So you are no longer

Haven't been for quite some time, my current activities have been clearly 
stated in my .sig for years.


> > (Note I've never said I'm "in favor of RAND", I've instead said that many
> > of the arguments against it are ill-conceived or naive).
>
>I see.  Would you have excluded

<snip>

Nothing in my arguments, Don, is personalized. I won't argue on that level, 
because none of my statements have been on that level (nor are they on the 
level of governmental revolutions).

Ann



Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hooya waling waling wi tiyil!

• References:
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Help regarding an XML attribute.
• Next by Date: interleave algorithm?
• Previous by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Next by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread