[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:04:14 -0400

At 03:35 PM 10/15/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>   I am curious as to why someone like you, who supposedly represent
>HTML writers,

I don't represent "HTML writers".  I am an invited expert, my company is 
WebGeek, Inc.

>would persistently argue in favor of RAND and ask rhetorical
>questions?

What rhetorical questions?

(Note I've never said I'm "in favor of RAND", I've instead said that many 
of the arguments against it are ill-conceived or naive).

Ann


Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hooya waling waling wi tiyil!

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?)
• Next by Date: Re: Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Next by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread