• From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:35:39 -0700

> >C2. I am disappointed with the lack of information on invited expert's
> >ability to communicate with people they represent, the public.
>
> Where did you get the idea that invited experts "represent" the public?

Ann, I was referring to the open source experts invited into the PPWG.  I
forgot to add 'the' before 'invited expert's'.

BTW, are any of the W3C specs you are working on depend on RAND being
passed?  I am curious as to why someone like you, who supposedly represent
HTML writers, would persistently argue in favor of RAND and ask rhetorical
questions?

Best,

Don Park

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!
• Next by Date: Re: Help regarding an XML attribute.
• Previous by thread: Re: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Next by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread