[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response

• From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:40:18 -0700

Ann Navarro wrote:
> I don't represent "HTML writers".  I am an invited expert, my company is
> WebGeek, Inc.

So you are no longer a governing board member of the HTML Writers Guild, and
the guild's representative to W3C, acting on behalf of the guild's some
50,000 web designers?  If not, then I appologize and allow me to correct
myself: you do not represent HTML writers.

> (Note I've never said I'm "in favor of RAND", I've instead said that many
> of the arguments against it are ill-conceived or naive).

I see.  Would you have excluded idiots and uneducated peasants from joining
the American Revolution just because their reasons for joining are
ill-conceived or naive?  Ann, don't you think that replying as you have to
done to my well-intended message is ill-conceived or naive?

Best,

Don Park

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Reinventing wheels (was RE: Slow xml-dev day (is everyb odyworking?))
• Next by Date: ANN: Pretty XML Tree Viewer
• Previous by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Next by thread: RE: Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread