RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@m...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit: >> Again, why would xml:id be architecturally superior? Without >> answers to that question, there is no reason to continue this >> thread because the requirement has not been clearly articulated. >To provide an interoperable meaning for nude-name XPointers that >does not depend on any particular vocabulary, format, or >schema. Ah. Are these expected to work in PDF? len "This would suggest that we should be looking at legislation to control the independence of the medium which we rely on and trust for so much." Tim Berners-Lee
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format