• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:59:22 -0600

From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@m...]

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

>> Again, why would xml:id be architecturally superior?  Without 
>> answers to that question, there is no reason to continue this 
>> thread because the requirement has not been clearly articulated. 

>To provide an interoperable meaning for nude-name XPointers that
>does not depend on any particular vocabulary, format, or
>schema.

Ah.  Are these expected to work in PDF?  

len

"This would suggest that we should be looking at legislation to control the
independence of the medium which we rely on and trust for so much." Tim
Berners-Lee

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Next by Date: RE: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread