• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: veillard@r...
• Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:14:06 -0500 (EST)

Daniel Veillard scripsit:

>   I would be tempted to say that xml:id being an ID, it's an
> ID duplicate and hence the document is invalid. No such document
> should exist at the moment since xml: is reserved ...

I agree except for the word "invalid"; it should be merely
xml:id-unconforming.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread