• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:15:52 -0500 (EST)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> Again, why would xml:id be architecturally superior?  Without 
> answers to that question, there is no reason to continue this 
> thread because the requirement has not been clearly articulated. 

To provide an interoperable meaning for nude-name XPointers that
does not depend on any particular vocabulary, format, or
schema.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread