[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
  • To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@S...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:29:43 -0800

> I may be digressing, but an implication of an XML DBMS support for
efficient
> storage/retrieval of well-formed XML is that you can get many benefits of
> using a DBMS without going through the agonies of data modelling, database
> design, and performance tuning that RDBMS-based applications traditionally
> suffer.

Gosh, I would still hope we do data modeling: it's part of data analysis.
Once you have it at a conceptual level, you still need to physically
represent it. Although that may be more intuitive (to us) in an XML
containment hierarchy than it would be in a set of relational tables strung
together with joins, there's still more than one way to skin a conceptual
cat, even in XML. 

Same goes for performance tuning. If you don't have the right properties
collocated in the elements, you're going to have a lot unnecessary document
navigation to do. Again, I don't pretend to imagine that doing it right in
XML is as hard as doing it right in an RDBMS, but easiest of all is doing it
wrong in ways multifarious.


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member