[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)

• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 05:53:10 -0400

On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 06:29:30PM +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>
>  
> > At 02:03 AM 10/6/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>   
> > How long do you think it takes to do a thorough examination of an IP 
> > portfolio with tens of thousands of items in it, to be able to declare with 
> > any kind of competence that there is no conflict that needs to be declared?
>  
> A IPR lawyer told me this week that the going rate for challenging a US 
> patent is about $100,000. 

 And of course the most well-know the lawyer, the most efficient it is
and the most expensive too.
 Patents have been used by corporate lawyers as long term investment
sometimes based on effective in-house research but in a lot of cases
on bogus but accepted claims. It's gonna be extremely hard to get them
to let this "wealth" go away.

> I find it difficult to reconcile talk of freedom and market forces when
> the reality seems to be that Western technological dominance is based
> on the state granting temporary monopolies.  

 It must be noted that the disease is far more advanced in the USA than
other Western countries. Though I agree fully with the statement. I hope
Europe will protect itself from the most pernicious part of patenting
algorithms. Corporate lobbying seems a bit less effective here than in
the US.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@r...  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
• Next by Date: Fwd: dtd to c struct conversion
• Previous by thread: RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
• Next by thread: RE: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread