• From: Michael Rys <mrys@m...>
• To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:44:41 -0700

<snip/>

> but an article that starts "This column takes a 
> look at so-called native XML databases"  by a guy whose 1000
> page book called "Professional XML Databases" never (AFAIK from the
index)
> even mentions the possibility of a "native" XML DBMS doesn't exactly
inspire

That's why the book is called Professional XML Databases and not Native
XML Databases ;-)

> As I think we all agree, if you *do* have
> to present XML views of data that is used by non-XML apps, it  is
probably
> better to use a tool that presents an XML view of an underlying RDBMS,
but
> this will cost you the going rate for a team of top-notch DBAs. 

This may be true for the DB2's of the world, but the SQL Server
annotated view mechanism can be done and used by non-DBAs. Now mind you,
you will stay at the mercy of the DBA, but you don't need the DBA to
define the XML views.

Best regards
Michael (slightly biased :-))

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Next by Date: ANN. NXML and Chunks version 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread