• From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• To: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>, Ken North <ken_north@c...>,xml-dev@l..., sateesh narahari <narahari@h...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:52:10 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Allen [mailto:joshuaa@m...]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:58 PM
> To: Ken North; xml-dev@l...; sateesh narahari
> Subject: RE:  Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards
> compliance"
> 
> 
> It is really hard to imagine any logic behind the recent
> move, other than "ooops!"
 
I don't really want to continue flogging this dead horse, but I just
saw Opera's press release on this episode:
http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/xhtml/20011026.xml

"The irony of Microsoft's claim to standards-support is complete when you
check the MSN.com site for compliance with the XHTML standard. Anyone can go
to the W3C's standards validation service at http://validator.w3.org/ and
type in www.msn.com. The document returned demonstrates clearly that not a
single document on their site adheres to W3C specifications, and many of
their documents do not use XHTML at all, e.g. http://careers.msn.com/."

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Microsoft's deeply cynical
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
• Next by Date: RE: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
• Previous by thread: [Q] Xerces and DOM2 getInternalSubset
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's deeply cynical
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread