• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:07:15 -0500

It isn't the first time I've faced this problem 
in my career.  Last time, I was for all RF-only 
too.

Only accept them in the most compelling cases 
and only with the consensus of the membership. 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Steele [mailto:xmlmaster@h...]



When I first started following this thread, I thought Len was being naive 
about software patents, or just looking for a good argument.

But I've come to think he's actually right about this: "RF Only" is perhaps 
too inflexible for the real world. "RAND" is (at least around these parts) 
intolerable.

• Prev by Date: Reminder: OASIS TC Call For Participation: ProvisioningServices
• Next by Date: RE: More patent funnies!
• Previous by thread: Re: More patent funnies!
• Next by thread: RE: More patent funnies!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread