Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
You just provide one implementation. There is no way to have 2 different implementations for a method with the same name and signature, even if you implement 2 different interfaces that declare that method. In the few cases where this has been an obstacle for me, I just created adapters and factory methods on the object to provide an appropriate adapter rather than implementing the interfaces directly. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:34 PM > To: xml-dev > Subject: Java: interface methods with same name and > signature > > > Sorry about the non-XML topic... > > Suppose I have two interfaces, both of which have a method > with the same > name and the same signature. For example: > > public interface foo1 {public void foo()} > public interface foo2 {public void foo()} > > Now suppose I want a single object to implement both interfaces: > > public class fooimp implements foo1, foo2 > > Calling methods shouldn't be a problem, as I can cast: > > fooimp fi = new fooimp(); > (foo1)fi.foo(); > (foo2)fi.foo(); > > But what is the syntax for actually implementing the methods? This is > clearly a problem: > > public class fooimp implements foo1, foo2 > { > public void foo() {...} // from foo1 > public void foo() {...} // from foo2 > } > > I couldn't find anything in the Java spec... > > Thanks, > > -- Ron
|
