[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RAND issues

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:19:04 -0500

This position eliminates most MPEG/MHEG liaison efforts, yes?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

I think that those standards which have to live in the
space where you might have to pay a toll to use them are 
precisely those which W3C should stay away from.  Yes they
exist - e.g. the IEEE standardizes lots of things which you
have to pay patents to use - but the reason the Web is 
interesting is that anyone can play without having to pay 
for permission.  I'm not interested in playing RAND games.  
I'm not interested in a Web where Open-Source efforts are 
second-class citizens.

I think that the W3C should adopt a policy of involving itself
only with RF patents, recognize that this is difficult and
complicated, and just deal with it.  Tools that are available
to achieve this goal include:

- requiring diligent search and disclosure from all members,
  not just those who participate in particular WGs, for IP
  that may stand in the way of some task or another
- where such IP exists and the holder isn't willing to grant
  RF, changing the standard to work around the IP
- use of the bully pulpit and any other leverage the W3C can 
  bring to bear to make it very painful for anyone who tries to 
  set up a tollbooth on W3C output
- declining to enter standardization activities where it 
  appears that RF status can't be achieved
  
I think this is very important. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RAND issues
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RAND issues
• Next by Date: Re: RAND issues
• Previous by thread: Re: RAND issues
• Next by thread: RE: RAND issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread