• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:17:32 +0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Clark [mailto:jjc@j...]
> Sent: 30 October 2001 01:32
> To: Tim Bray; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Re: determining ID-ness in XML
> 
> [... xml:idatt proposal ...]

I like James' proposal. 

However I'd suggest that the 80/20 split lies at not allowing 
more than one ID attribute per element. (So I'm disagreeing 
with DavidB and DonP, at my peril, I'm sure! :)

This restriction exists for DTDs so it's not a downgrade step.

Or are there are specific use cases that I'm missing?

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: RE: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread