[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: more on "subelement signicance"

• From: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 17:28:16 -0400

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
> It is still *useful* in that it is a well-formed construction
> independent of position in the tree or location in a document
> or namespace.  That is of limited use but real.  It might
> require extra-XML knowledge for example, but spiders that
> troll the net doing indexing might only care about meta tags
> (again, limited but possible).

This makes sense to me.

> So cases exist for which simply knowing <a href="stuff" >
> is useful.  Context is usually important but the
> rule as stated is too narrow.


Okay.  What is missing or how exactly is it too narrow?  Give me your
version of the statement that would satisfy your understanding.

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@s...

• References:
  • RE: more on "subelement signicance"
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more on "subelement signicance"
• Next by Date: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Previous by thread: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Next by thread: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread