[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: more on "subelement signicance"

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>,"DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@l...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:26:11 -0500

They have a range of frequency of occurrence in 
which the semantic is the same.  A global definition 
may exist but empirically, is not required.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Seairth Jacobs [mailto:seairth@s...]

So these types of elements have a sort of "globally implied" definition that
is independent of a specific doctype?   If the above statement were to be
extended to include these "global" elements within a given domain, would the
statement be complete?  I gotta go think about this a bit...

• Prev by Date: Re: more on "subelement signicance"
• Next by Date: Re: more on "subelement signicance"
• Previous by thread: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Next by thread: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread