[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 21:41:57 -0700

At 02:28 PM 06/10/01 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>When an application tries to find the schema or other resources for a document, it seems that it should
> 1) look for locally cached versions or defaults that matches the namespace, else
> 2) check for any specific catalog entry, using any hints such as xsi:schemaLocation
>    or the namespace.
> 3) If 1) or 2) return a RDDL directory, then dereference that accordingly.

I wouldn't expect to find a RDDL by following an 
xsi:schemaLocation, I'd expect to find an XSD, n'est-ce pas?
#1 and #3 seem plausible. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Latest version of MSV
    • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>
  • CATALOGs versus RDDL
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: MSV and Xerces
• Next by Date: Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
• Previous by thread: CATALOGs versus RDDL
• Next by thread: Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread