Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Richard,
Richard Tobin wrote:
>>I had a closer look and it's quite different from what I was thinking of.
>>
>
> Yes, it is, but you might find it useful anyway, in that you could
> write a stylesheet to get from our serialization to what you want.
> Remember, once you have the information you want in XML it's just a
> matter of XSLT...
I have said "different", not "useless" :) !!!
I find it very useful and think it should be given more visibility and
maybe even become normative at some point.
For the first time, I "see" a concrete PSVI. I find this very helpful to
understand it and I hope you will develop your idea of including the
PSVI contributions for ID/IDREF/IDREFS and unique/key/keyref as well
which might give an answer to another thread raised on the xsl-list.
Now, if the objective is to have a lightweight language which minimizes
the changes on the source document and tries to be as independent as
possible from the schema language, it might be used as a starting point
of a XSLT transformation as you mentioned but isn't a good candidate as
a "final" step!
Thanks
Eric
>
> -- Richard
>
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
