• From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:34:55 -0700

> Is there some sort of semantic game-playing here, or is
> this just a case where different groups of lawyers mean
> different things by "Royalty Free"?  And if the latter,
> shouldn't W3C use a less ambiguous term?

Aye.  Strike the word 'Royalty' from 'Royalty Free' and I'll be happy.  I
see standardization process as a key counter balance against patent-happy
crowds who abuse the patent system.  If W3C adopts RAND, W3C will end up
being a four letter word to me.  - Don

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RAND issues
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: RAND issues
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: more on "subelement signicance"
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...)
• Previous by thread: Re: RAND issues
• Next by thread: RE: RAND issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread