• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: David Lyon <david@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:44:36 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lyon [mailto:david@g...]
> Sent: 24 October 2001 14:18
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? - Maybe it's
> time togo to XML 2.0
> 
> Maybe it's time to move onto working on an XML version 2.0
> [...]

I don't see how you derive a need for XML 2.0 from a discussion 
about issues about W3C XML Schemas (XSD)? 

XML 1.0 and XSD are 2 different things.

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? - Maybe it's time togo to XML 2.0
    • From: David Lyon <david@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance"
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance"
• Previous by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? - Maybe it's time togo to XML 2.0
• Next by thread: [Announce] Word - XML bi-directional conversion now available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread