|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups
Len, Interesting. I'd be interested if you have contact information for these chaps. Regards David Lyon On Monday 15 October 2001 23:41, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Ummm... five years is the ISO cycle for review and that isn't a > bad idea. It isn't going to start on XML-Dev as Yet Another We > Have Laid-Off Programmers In Need of Something to Hack Project. > The W3C owns XML, has rules for who can work on what, who can > initiate the work and how that work will be scheduled. > > Isn't the TAG supposed to be looking into issues like this? > Bray and Connoly were appointed to the by Berners-Lee. Maybe > they should be looking into the review of XML 1.0. Ask them. > > len > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Greif [mailto:jgreif@a...] > > I think that Len meant that being around 4 years was insufficient > justification in itself for starting work on XML 2.0; rather, a list of > putative mistakes, dubious decisions, omissions and potential enhancements > would drive people to initiate action. Of course, you probably didn't mean > that being around 4 years was a good reason in itself either. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








