[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RAND issues

• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 18:18:20 -0400

On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 02:46:19PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> And if Oracle's competitors who are also W3C members 
> believe it is vital to their health to have these 
> standards, Oracle's refusal to enable the WG will 
> be allowed to stand?  Or if a competitor decides it 

  No. A working group is proposed. If there is enough
interest work will proceed. Just depend on the number
of members who want to work on it.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@r...  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: RAND issues
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RAND issues
• Next by Date: Re: Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
• Previous by thread: Re: RAND issues
• Next by thread: RE: RAND issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread