[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!

• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:42:16 -0700

Len I know how much money it costs to invent new art in software, that's my
business. I also know that it's possible to recoup your investment and make
a profit, but you have to keep moving and keep the customers satisfied.
Further I believe software is speech, and protected in the US by the First
Amendment. I don't have time to exhaustively look at existing software
patents, I am a software developer, not a lawyer. In a world with patents on
software ideas, only lawyers will be able to write software. I'll opt out at
that point, with no disrespect to lawyers, I just don't want to be or become
one. Thanks. Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Cc: <w3c-ac-forum@w...>
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: RE:  Cutting special deals for open source developers --
no way!


> One might start by exhaustively looking that existing
> software patents and determining which if any are justifiable.
> One should try to ascertain when a patent is warranted and
> not dismiss them all out of hand given that this may also
> be a barrier to innovation.  Patents are revenue source
> for small companies as well as large, for universities,
> and for individuals.  For example, MIT will fight you
> because they also have a lucrative patent pool and recently
> have filed suit against Sony et al.
>
> Then arguments can be made on precedent and example rather
> than only on principle.  That will be a long haul and in
> the mean time that paralysis on the specification process
> that Joshua Allen has mentioned will continue.
>
> I totally agree: fair for one should be fair for all.
>
> len
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@u...]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:20 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Cc: w3c-ac-forum@w...
> Subject:  Cutting special deals for open source developers --
> no way!
>
>
> The myth that there are big companies and open source developers and
nothing
> inbetween has been a constant problem for commercial developers who
believe
> in open standards and think that software patents are unethical and act
> accordingly. I've seen this myth perpetrated over and over by well-meaning
> people, but it's dangerous and unfair.
>
> I read this news item in eWeek [1], with a statement from the patent WG
> chair, Daniel Weitzner, saying that there they will consider an exception
> for open source developers. As a commercial and open source developer,
this
> highlights the impossibility of having the W3C work with patents at all.
If
> open source is to be granted some kind of exception, then that exception
> must also apply to independent commercial developers, especially those who
> invent non-patented new art that others may freely use in their software.
> This has long been UserLand's policy, to create new techniques, designs,
> algorithms, protocols and formats, in a manner so that anyone can build
> software on them. We believe this is the only ethical way to create
> software. To prevent others from using our techniques would be akin to a
> book author inventing a new plot and then preventing other authors from
> using it. No such protection is possible because it would be (in the US)
an
> illegal limit on free speech. We believe that the same protection applies
to
> software developers because software is a creative act that is very
similar
> to writing.
>
> It's time to get a grip on how our industry works, how much exchange of
> ideas there is between our products, and get comfortable with all
> developers, using whatever economic system they choose, participating in
the
> market on equal footing with all other developers. Patents have no place
in
> open software development processes. It's very unfortunate that USPTO
> believes otherwise, I think the W3C, to true to  the spirit of its
charter,
> must work tirelelessly to convince the USPTO that its policy on patents
> can't work, and if that fails, take the matter to court. Under no
> circumstances should special deals be cut for groups that unfairly limit
> opportunties for others.
>
> Dave Winer, CEO
> UserLand Software
>
> [1] http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D16297,00.asp
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • RE: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!
• Next by Date: Re: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!
• Previous by thread: RE: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!
• Next by thread: Re: Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread