• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:59:17 -0400 (EDT)

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> In the meantime, I think I'm going to start recommending the use of
> application/xml and deprecating the use of text/xml. 

Absolutely; as one poster said, it is one of the most important moves.
It almost never makes sense to use text/xml, unless your text is cleverly
arranged to be both WF XML and readable to someone who never heard of XML
*or* i18n.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
• Next by Date: Re: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Previous by thread: Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
• Next by thread: Re: Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread