• From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 11:25:39 -0700

> No, just the API and the ideas. I have a programmer working with it at the moment. 

Wow, you should definitely have him/her drop an e-mail to me.


> I think we want to visit all the nodes in the abstract grammar, but there does
> not seem to be any built-in way to flag that a Expression has been visited: 
> is that correct?

Right. Depending on the way you want to traverse grammars, you need to
implement that check by yourself.

I usually use a set to mark visited nodes (typically you only need to do
this for ReferenceExp and/or ElementExp, depending on the case.)


> Also, any indication on Sun's plans for MSV, when a new version might
> come out, and how stable you think the API (especially the abstract API)
> is, all these would be very useful to know. 

I'm glad that the new version is released yesterday. It's not open
source but it comes with the source code.

I would say the abstract API is stable enough. There is no plan to make
any change on it.



regards,
--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...

• Prev by Date: XML+JDBC=data portability (IBM tutorials)
• Next by Date: RE: Ambiguous Content Model
• Previous by thread: XML+JDBC=data portability (IBM tutorials)
• Next by thread: RAND issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread