• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:13:33 +0000 (GMT)

In article <03da01c1620b$22d4ac90$0400a8c0@scott> you write:

>Existing (non xmlid-conformant parsers) would declare the document invalid
>whereas updated applications would declare it valid.

Right, but my point was that it would be wrong to use such a document
with existing parsers *anyway*, because it contains the reserved name
xml:id.  The whole point of "reserved" is that you can't expect
appropriate behaviour from processors that don't conform to whatever
spec provides a definition of the reserved name.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>

• Prev by Date: The call for presentations for the XML Europe 2002Conference is now open
• Next by Date: Simple Beginners Problems
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread