• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: James Clark <jjc@j...>, Tim Bray <tbray@t...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 19:02:24 -0800

> An alternative would be to have an attribute that declares the name of the 
> attribute that is an ID attribute, say xml:idatt. To make this useable, 
> xml:idatt would be inherited.  

Good idea -- so long as there's a sibling "xml:idatts", so that multiple
attributes can be defined as defining IDs.  I really do not like the
arbitrary restriction that elements may not have IDs defined for more
than one purpose.

- Dave

• Follow-Ups:
  • permanent keys (was Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
    • From: Nikita Ogievetsky <nogievet@c...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Frank Richards <frichards@s...>

• References:
  • Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: Re: XML Database Decision Tree?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: permanent keys (was Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread