Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi,
Quoting RFC 3023, section 8.5:
| 8.5 Text/xml with Omitted Charset
|
| Content-type: text/xml
|
| {BOM}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
|
| or
|
| {BOM}<?xml version="1.0"?>
|
| This example shows text/xml with the charset parameter omitted. In
| this case, MIME and XML processors MUST assume the charset is "us-
| ascii",
... and issue a fatal error, no BOM in US-ASCII. Mentioning UTF-16 in
this example is absurd, XML documents labeled as text/xml without
charset parameter can never ever be UTF-16 encoded. So, who tells me I
am wrong and text/xml documents without charset parameter may still be
UTF-8 encoded (and use non-ASCII characters)? Apache uses text/xml as
default type for .xml documents, are they asking for interoperability
problems or what?
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@h... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
