XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2002

• ANNOUNCE: Ruple (XML Spaces) Alpha Version 2, Andy Gray
• RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MSthinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Michael Brennan
• Check out the pipeline submission, Tim Bray
  • Re: Check out the pipeline submission, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Michael Brennan
• RE: Fwd: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl, Michael Brennan
• xml/XSL and javascript form issue, rockie12
  • Re: xml/XSL and javascript form issue, Thomas B. Passin
• Call For Papers: ebXML track at XML Europe 2002, Karl F. Best
• updated xmlns media feature, Simon St.Laurent
• Use of CONOPS in Sharable Service Contracts (WAS RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Fwd: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl, James Michael DuPont
• RE: Simple xpath software request, Joshua Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Simple xpath software request, Michael Brennan
  • RE: Simple xpath software request, Michael Brennan
• Either ... or ... in Schema, rajac
  • RE: Either ... or ... in Schema, Michael Fitzgerald
• Simple xpath software request, Kris Thompson
  • Re: Simple xpath software request, Daniel Veillard
    • Re: Simple xpath software request, Mike Thanos
      • Re: Simple xpath software request, Christian Nentwich
• RE: Image (bitmap) in XML document, Michael Brennan
  • XML Standards Library 1.0 : Updated 1 March 2002, MWS Tech Support
• Image (bitmap) in XML document, Handoko
• Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Wayne Steele
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Michael Brennan
• Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Wayne Steele
  • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Jason Diamond
    • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Tim Bray
    • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Daniel Veillard
    • RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Julian Reschke
      • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations, Jason Diamond
• ANN: Xalt Object Realizer version 1.0, Ramesh Gupta
• looking for existing XSL code, Wo Chang
• RE: REST as RPC done right, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: REST as RPC done right, Joshua Allen
    • Re: REST as RPC done right, Paul Prescod
  • RE: REST as RPC done right, Joshua Allen
• REST as RPC done right, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: REST as RPC done right, Mike Champion
  • Re: REST as RPC done right, Mark Baker
    • Re: REST as RPC done right, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: REST as RPC done right, Paul Prescod
    • Re: REST as RPC done right, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: REST as RPC done right, Paul Prescod
      • Re: REST as RPC done right, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: REST as RPC done right, Jim Ancona
      • RE: REST as RPC done right, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: REST as RPC done right, Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Michael Brennan
    • Re: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MSthinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Paul Prescod
• Re: XML to object relational, Ronald Bourret
• repeating element names in single XML vocabulary, Lyndon J B Nixon
• [Announce] Apache Xindice XML database 1.0rc2 Released, Kimbro Staken
• HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Sean McGrath
  • Re: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), John Cowan
  • Re: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinksHTTP Needs Replacing???), Paul Prescod
  • RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Bill de hÓra
    • Re: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Paul Prescod
      • RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???), Bill de hÓra
• RE: Namespaces best practices, Manos Batsis
• NEXTWARE Spring 2002 brochure available for download, Ken North
• Data Dictionary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Namespaces best practices, Friedland, Zachary (TLP 2001)
• RE: New Patent Policy Draft, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: New Patent Policy Draft, Rex Brooks
• RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, David LeBlanc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Mark Baker
    • Re: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Mike Champion
      • request to unsubscribe, chodge5
    • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Leigh Dodds
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Joshua Allen
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Mike Champion
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Francis Norton
    • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Andrzej Jan Taramina
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Joshua Allen
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, AManns
    • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Alaric Snell
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Francis Norton
  • RE: RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Michael Brennan
    • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Michael Brennan
    • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Thomas B. Passin
• MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Mike Champion
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, David LeBlanc
    • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Andrzej Jan Taramina
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Leigh Dodds
    • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Alaric Snell
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Paul Prescod
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Alaric Snell
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Paul Prescod
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Mark Baker
      • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Bill de hÓra
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Paul Prescod
    • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???, Thomas B. Passin
• <OT> MaGIC, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• 3: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, "Braumüller, Hans"
• RE: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Mike Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Michael Brennan
• Evaluating RPC versus REST, Leigh Dodds
  • Re: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Mark Baker
  • Re: Evaluating RPC versus REST, Paul Prescod
• RE: Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis, Mike Champion
  • Re: Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis, Simon St.Laurent
• New Patent Policy Draft, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: New Patent Policy Draft, Simon St.Laurent
• unsubscibe, Martin Lang
• RE: 2: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, Manos Batsis
• 2: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, =?utf-8?B?IkJyYXVtw7xsbGVyLCBIYW5zIg==?=
  • RE: 2: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, Priscilla Walmsley
• RE: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, Manos Batsis
• XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, Braumuller, Hans
  • Re: XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ?, TAN Kuan Hui
• XInclude & Document Function., aruns
  • Re: XInclude & Document Function., Jeni Tennison
• XPath and performance, Mark Nottingham
  • DOM L3 and Type info, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: DOM L3 and Type info, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: XPath and performance, bob mcwhirter
• Test, CHIUSANO, Joseph
• Reminder: deadline for participation in new OASIS TCs, Karl F. Best
• Doubts relating to XML, seshu
• <redefine> and schema constraints, Nada_Reinprecht
  • Re: <redefine> and schema constraints, Rick Jelliffe
• <?P[SV]I?>, Eric van der Vlist
• RE: XML & government in general, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML & government in general, Hodder, Ed
  • RE: XML & government in general, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ANNOUNCE: SAX2 book from O'Reilly, David Brownell
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: SAX2 book from O'Reilly, Andrzej Jan Taramina
• XML & government in general, Tim Bray
  • Re: XML & government in general, John Wilson
  • RE: XML & government in general, Michael Kay
    • Re: XML & government in general, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • RE: XML & government in general, Paul Spencer
• RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security), Michael Brennan
• Re: Simplified XPointer, jborden
• RE: The InfoApocalypse, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Data-oriented XML [was: Scatter/gather pattern], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Simplified XPointer, jborden
  • Re: Simplified XPointer, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: Simplified XPointer, Jonathan Borden
• How do I use my own JavaClass???, Cyrill Zadra
  • RE: How do I use my own JavaClass???, Michael Kay
• The InfoApocalypse, Tim Bray
• RE: SOAP and Firewalls, Joshua Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SOAP and Firewalls, Joshua Allen
    • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP and Firewalls, Michael Brennan
    • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP and Firewalls, Michael Brennan
• RE: On the use of HTTP as a Substrate, Michael Brennan
• SOAP and Firewalls, Paul Prescod
  • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Alaric Snell
    • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Amy Lewis
      • RE: SOAP and Firewalls, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Joe English
    • Re: SOAP and Firewalls, Paul Prescod
• ICE Authoring Group Releases Draft Requirements for Industry Comment, Elledge, Marion
• RE: What is SOAP?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: What is SOAP?, Zach Kenyon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What is SOAP?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Anderson, John
  • RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Michael Brennan
• Prescod on REST, useful clear summary, Edd Dumbill
• RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security), Michael Brennan
  • RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security), Paul Prescod
• On the use of HTTP as a Substrate, Simon St.Laurent
• Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available], Roger L. Costello
  • Re: Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available], Sean McGrath
    • Re: Data-oriented XML [was: Scatter/gather pattern], Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe PresentationAvailable], Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available], Sean McGrath
• even more tunneling, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: even more tunneling, Thomas B. Passin
  • 3rd party tool, K.R.Vaidyanathan
    • Re: 3rd party tool, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: 3rd party tool, XML Everywhere
• What is SOAP?, Amy Lewis
  • Re: What is SOAP?, Zach Kenyon
  • Re: What is SOAP?, Paul Prescod
• Why make namespaces so complicated?, Anderson, John
  • Re: Why make namespaces so complicated?, Patrick Stickler
• RE: Worse XML tools?, Anderson, John
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Koorn, Wilco
    • RE: Worse XML tools?, Handoko
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Worse XML tools?, John Cowan
      • Re: Worse XML tools?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Worse XML tools?, John Cowan
  • RE: Worse XML tools?, Anderson, John
• Worse XML tools?, Eric van der Vlist
• New XPipe Presentation available, Sean McGrath
  • New XPipe Presentation available, Allan Doyle
    • Re: New XPipe Presentation available, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: New XPipe Presentation available, Paul Prescod
• Problem with XML Schema, rajac
  • Re: Problem with XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security), Michael Brennan
• Architecture Description Markup Language, Michael Brennan
• RDDL: minor update, jborden
  • Re: RDDL: minor update, Tim Bray
• RE: Inclusion in XML versus SGML, Anderson, John
• Use of © in XML/XSLT, Ryan Fransen
  • Re: Use of © in XML/XSLT, Alaric Snell
  • RE: Use of © in XML/XSLT, Michael Kay
• Inclusion in XML versus SGML, Sevigny Benoît
  • Re: Inclusion in XML versus SGML, John Cowan
    • Re: Inclusion in XML versus SGML, Eve L. Maler
  • RE: Inclusion in XML versus SGML, Michael Fitzgerald
• Re: Namespace dispatching, Patrick Stickler
• Regarding Java code to XML, Ramur
• Xerces Parser Installation, rajac
• Xerces2.0.0 Parser, rajac
  • Re: Xerces2.0.0 Parser, Thomas B. Passin
    • simple xslt question, Wo Chang
      • Re: simple xslt question, Wo Chang
      • RE: simple xslt question, Michael Kay
• RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Joshua Allen
  • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • Re: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Mike Champion
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Joshua Allen
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Joshua Allen
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Zach Kenyon
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Amy Lewis
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Zach Kenyon
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Amy Lewis
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Amy Lewis
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Michael Brennan
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Michael Brennan
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Michael Brennan
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, John Cowan
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Michael Brennan
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Michael Brennan
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Joshua Allen
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Zach Kenyon
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Francis Norton
      • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Paul Prescod
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Joshua Allen
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security, Bullard, Claude L (Len)