[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WSIO and Good is Better

• To: 'Michael Brennan' <Michael_Brennan@A...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:56:53 -0600

I imagine it allowed them to move quickly without 
a lot of chorus noise.  War has a way of suspending 
the perceived God-given rights.

But it legitimizes the WSIO-like efforts.  All is fair....

Again, the main problem efforts like DSDL, RELAX-NG, and 
now this face is that just as the web service market starts 
to heat up, they come along an [expletive deleted] on the fire.  Ever 
relight wood after doing that?  It requires gasoline.

On the other hand, if one really wants a layered architecture 
for XML, this is a good place to start.  It is XML 1.0 conforming.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brennan [mailto:Michael_Brennan@A...]

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]

<snip/>

> So everyone gets to have their own skunk works these days.
> 
> "We envision applications of XML where a single XML document 
> may contain elements and attributes from more than one markup 
> vocabulary. One motivation for this is modularity; if such a 
> markup vocabulary exists which is well-understood and for 
> which there is useful software available, it is better to 
> re-use this markup rather than re-invent it."
> 
> http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html

My, my. Some folks have been holding out on us. Well, I have some of my
weekend reading picked out, now.

  ;-)

• Prev by Date: [ANN]: DecisionSoft announce release of XPath for Xerces-C
• Next by Date: RE: Doctypes again (was Re: Documents within documents)
• Previous by thread: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• Next by thread: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread