Re: REST has too many verbs
Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > > On Monday 11 February 2002 01:13 pm, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > After spending a few hours catching up on the REST discussion here > > and the discussions which led to it, I'm starting to wonder if > > REST's adoration of HTTP raises problems itself. > > This is almost exactly what I said to Paul and Mark earlier. Simon seems to want *0* verbs. You wanted 3. I think that's a difference not just in degree, but in fundamental architecture. > ... Roy's > thesis even points out some of the issues with HTTP vis-a-vis REST... > to the point that experimentation with things other than HTTP seems > sensible. Certainly, nobody could ever argue with experimentation. But for the same reasons that WSIO exists to help people build services now, HTTP is a mechanism for building services now. The complaints about HTTP that you and Simon are making seem quite vague and seem to me to be rooted in pre-judging rather than evaluating. Try HTTP for a system. We've got a whole mailing list set up to help you through the process. If it runs out of steam, tell us where and when. Then we can more easily evaluate whether to start again from scratch or extend what we've got. Paul Prescod
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format