|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v
Among the ways to do this is CORBA AMI (Asynchronous Messaging). You pass the object reference of the object that's waiting for the callback. In some CORBA implementations you specify the signature of the synchronous message, and indicate as a configuration option that you also want an asynch version, and much of the rest is done automatically by the IDL compiler. You still have to fill in the implementation of the callback, of course. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...> To: <andrzej@c...> Cc: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@A...>; <costello@m...>; <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 6:15 PM Subject: Re: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented > Andrzej Jan Taramina scripsit: > > > True, but the tendancy (including SOAPs RPC) seems to be towards a > > synchronous approach. Async request/response usually takes a lot of extra > > coding (beyond synchronous RPC or even Pub/Sub messaging). > > What I'd like to see is a convention whereby you can send an async > request packaged with a "continuation" to which the reply is sent.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








