[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs

• To: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs
• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:49:32 +0000 (GMT)
• In-reply-to: <E16bC2A-0006At-00@m...>

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Cowan wrote:

> That means that they are not equivalent in *convenience*.
> When I say they are equivalent in power, I mean it in the
> same sense that assembly language and Prolog are said to be equivalent
> in power: they are both Turing-complete.

Noooo! I knew it'd come to this.

ABS

• References:
  • Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by Date: Re: OT: Re: OT: Arguments (was: a number of other threads)
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by thread: Ecclesiastes 12:12
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread