[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:12:14 +0000
• In-reply-to: <E16aiuP-0002o4-00@m...>
• References: <E16aiuP-0002o4-00@m...>

On Tuesday 12 February 2002 19:48, John Cowan wrote:

> No, Alaric's right:  http://www.alaric-snell.com is not Alaric Snell.
> This is where topic maps get it right.
>
> Let us define a subject as anything that can be talked about.  Then
> subjects come in two flavors: those which are resources (with native
> URIs) and those which aren't.  The W3C home page is a resource, the
> W3C is not.  They have different properties and can't be blindly
> identified.
[snip]
> http://lists.xml.org/blah-blah-blah.html#pain
>
> where blah-blah-blah won't be known until after I've finished
> writing this email.

Now that's more the angle I was aiming at :-)

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread