Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
On Thursday 14 February 2002 12:25, you wrote: > It should be clear up front what "flavor" of URI you have, and > whether it does or does not denote some retrievable resource > or whether it denotes some abstract resource -- or if it is > in fact the actual resource (consider a data: URI). And that > should be based on a formal classification of URI schemes and > URI classes. I always thought that's what the URN / URL distinction was for, but the W3C went and specified namespace URIs instead of URNs. Bastards. ABS -- Alaric B. Snell http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/ Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format