[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing na

• To: "The Deviants" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 01:04:53 +1100
• References: <6D54B6A5DCF9D311971600D0B74758C101441B66@a...> <098701c1aa69$4d4d3cc0$0a2e249b@n...> <010801c1aa7d$f828ec70$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3C5A76E6.E193DC29@r...>

 From: "Ronald Bourret" <rpbourret@r...>
 
> Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> Funny. MSXML implemented this a while back and Microsoft was pilloried
> for not being standards compliant :) Personally, I always thought it was
> a good way to resolve the namespaces / DTD dilemma.
 
Did they?   I remember they made it that only #FIXED was recognized,
not apparantly for any interesting sinister motives, which is not what I am 
bringing up here.

Cheers
Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces in XML and schemas
• Next by Date: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Previous by thread: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread