[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations

default xpath namespace not allowed
At 12:41 PM 27/02/02 -0800, Wayne Steele wrote:
>Is the below document "conforming" with regard to the XML-Namespaces rec?
><root xmlns:a="" />

It's not, but this is probably a bug BTW.  You can "undeclare" the
default namespace like so:

<root xmlns="foo" >
 <child xmlns="" />

so why shouldn't you be able to undeclare other prefixes, e.g.

<root xmlns:foo="bar" >
  <child xmlns:foo="" />

James Clark was the first to notice this, but that was after
namespaces had been out for a year.

BTW, *nobody* thinks it's a good idea to allow a namespace name 
to be an empty string - if the abovec were allowed, it would
strictly be in the interests of undeclaring prefixes; which
would break no existing namespace semantics.  Who knows,
it might even get done someday. -Tim


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.