[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)

• To: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:17:15 +0000
• In-reply-to: <E16b151-0006xy-00@s...>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE84F@HQ5> <E16awp3-0002La-00@c...> <E16b151-0006xy-00@s...>

On Wednesday 13 February 2002 14:51, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2002 05:37 am, Alaric Snell wrote:
> > This is a different form of the Turing Tarpit, I reckon: that place
> > where debates over the expressive power of programming languages go
> > to, when everyone points out that all the languages can express the
> > same set of algorithms.
>
> Give me combinators! ;-)
>

You truly are a man after my own heart, Gavin!

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • RE: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by Date: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Next by thread: OT: Arguments (was: a number of other threads)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread