[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Worse XML tools?

• To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@m...>, John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Worse XML tools?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:56:20 -0600

A mild chuckle was what it was I think before BabelFish 
got hold of the thread.

It's like your Evil Overlord series:  do everything in that list 
and you will cease to do evil. Maybe that's the point.  If 
one does the right things for the wrong reasons, one might 
get the right outcome but be very frustrated by that.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

The fact that Software AG and XML Spy have paid for sponsored links when
the word "XML" and "tools" are searched for is expected and mildly
amusing when one considers that they show up in when the search terms
are worst+tool+XML. However, I don't see how it can be considered a
topic for discussion besides a mild chuckle.   

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Worse XML tools?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Next by Date: RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
• Previous by thread: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Next by thread: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread