|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] <snip/> > It's not, but this is probably a bug BTW. You can "undeclare" the > default namespace like so: > > <root xmlns="foo" > > <child xmlns="" /> > </root> > > so why shouldn't you be able to undeclare other prefixes, e.g. > > <root xmlns:foo="bar" > > <child xmlns:foo="" /> > </root> I never thought this was a bug. It seems logical, to me. There is no way to include an element with no namespace if a default namespace is in scope, unless you undeclare the default namespace. A namespace mapped to a prefix poses no such impediment, though. The current formulation seems reasonable to me.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








