[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs

• To: ext Jonathan Borden <jborden@a...>, Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>, Paul Prescod <paul@p...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs
• From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@n...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:54:55 +0200
• In-reply-to: <001801c1b48a$61177ba0$0301a8c0@n...>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

On 2002-02-13 14:31, "ext Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...> wrote:


> Paul is entirely correct.
> 
> A URI is simply a name for a thing, whatever that thing may be. A name is
> not the thing that it names

How about 'data:foo'? Or do you consider that a self-referential name?

There is an entire class of URIs which are also resources and
do not denote anything else.

C.f. http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pstickler-uri-taxonomy-00.txt

> URIs are names.

Some are.

> )note new email address -- which refers to the same person as
> jborden@m...)

No. An email address does not refer to a person.

Does sales@a... refer to some person named 'sales'?

An email address is just that. A place to put mail.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@n...

• References:
  • URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by Date: Re: Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by thread: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread