[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Worse XML tools?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Worse XML tools?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:32:41 -0500
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8FD@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Yes.  Google probably uses most visited and most 
> linked to.


Most linked to and most linked from.

>  It may also sell positions. 


It does not.  It does sell keywords, so "worst xml tools"
will get the same "Sponsored Links" (clearly so marked)
as "best xml tools", based on the presence of "xml tools".

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Worse XML tools?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Worse XML tools?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML & government in general
• Next by Date: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Previous by thread: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Next by thread: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread