[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Namespace terminology

• To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• Subject: Re: Namespace terminology
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:15:39 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEIEDPAA.julian.reschke@g...> from JulianReschke at "Feb 6, 2002 01:10:36 am"

Julian Reschke scripsit:

> So why do you say that a namespace name isn't (identified by) a URI
> reference?

Because we established with great pain some time ago that relative
URIs are a Really, Really Bad Idea in namespace names.  They are
not technically illegal, but they are very deprecated.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Namespace terminology
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespace terminology
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace terminology
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace terminology
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace terminology
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread