[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST an

• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>, "'Mike Champion'" <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security)
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:53:43 -0800

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]

<snip/>

> I'm sold on 
> 
> 1.  Training before development of web services. 
> 2.  Inspection prior to deployment of web services.
> 3.  Security testing suites.
> 4.  Properly constructed contracts for web services 
>     that include security provisions and remediation clauses.
> 
> Which is how the best will do business anyway and buying 
> less than quality is a mistake to begin with.  I think that 
> list above is a good one for the WSIO to consider.

That sounds great to me.

> I'm not sold on but convinced that web services will result 
> in some web service business types becoming regulated businesses 
> just as the utilities are.  It will take some years and 
> a change of administration for that to happen, and probably, 
> a catastrophe to get their attention.

Yeah, and unfortunately I think you are right that it will take a
catastrophe -- and even then they will most likely botch it. The government
doesn't have a good track record of *intelligent* regulation of
technology-related matters. Anti-hacker efforts, for instance, seem to have
put more whistle-blowers and good-samaritans in jail then malicious hackers.
It would be wise for the industry to get out in front of this issue. It
would be very wise for the WSIO to take this up.
 

• Prev by Date: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by Date: Re: SOAP and Firewalls
• Previous by thread: RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security)
• Next by thread: RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and R EST and security)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread