[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Simple Schema

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Simple Schema
• From: "rajac" <rajac@n...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 05:42:25 +0530
• References: <5C9461BDD6ABD511815500D0B7B7A0E2247F86@n...-internal>

Hi KRUMPOLEC Martin,
  Even then(after changing from minOccur to minOccurs), it is failing.
Initially i was using minOccurs only.

Rgds.,
Raja

----- Original Message -----
From: "KRUMPOLEC Martin" <krumpolec@a...>
To: "'rajac'" <rajac@n...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 5:16 PM
Subject: RE:  Simple Schema


> Hi rajac,
>
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> > <xs:element name="note">
> >     <xs:complexType>
> >       <xs:sequence>
> >         <xs:element name="to" type="xs:string" minOccur="1"
> > maxOccur="5"/>
> >         <xs:element name="heading" type="xs:string" minOccur="1"
> > maxOccur="5"/>
> >         <xs:element name="body" type="xs:string" minOccur="1"
> > maxOccur="5"/>
> >       </xs:sequence>
> >     </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> > </xs:schema>
>
>   Your schema is invalid - please note difference between
>   minOccur/minOccurs and maxOccur/maxOccurs ...
>
> HTH
>
> Martin
>
> --
> Martin Krumpolec <krumpo@p...>

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Simple Schema
    • From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>

• References:
  • RE: Simple Schema
    • From: KRUMPOLEC Martin <krumpolec@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Simple Schema
• Next by Date: Re: [Ann - Zvon] Templatotron
• Previous by thread: RE: Simple Schema
• Next by thread: RE: Simple Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread