|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
Disruptive, perhaps, but not much of an innovation. Really, taking apart the requirements and doing the least amount to get the biggest bang works. Big bangs are disruptive, but if you step back, hypermedia systems at that time were still very much a niche technology even with all the years of research. Without cheap processors and memory, none of it works at scale. That is why the noodlers in the academic and research worlds got so far ahead in the models and requirements: no real competition and no real integration. Dexter was as far as I can tell, old friends getting together in a cheap motel for a long weekend of noodling, but I don't know. :-) Still, it is worth trying to ascertain if there are models or Internet applications for which REST is inapplicable or unsustainable. I've got serious guys here who say tightly coupled web services are the way to go. That said, at the bottom of it, the bigger problem is still the emergence and acceptance of common vocabularies, same as it ever was. Regardless of what we wrap them in, we still have to build those and that is 90% a political/sales job. len -----Original Message----- From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...] 2/26/2002 12:49:57 PM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote: >That's a bit fast on the draw, Leigh. Perhaps some review of >that Herzog thesis is in order. > >http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/staff/herzog/thesis > >Are you sure REST doesn't fall apart in other models of hypermedia frameworks, >or sure we need those frameworks? Thanks for that link, it's definitely interesting. I'd guess from reading the about the Dexter framework that HTTP/REST was a classic "disruptive innovation". A recent discussion is at http://www.inc.com/search/23854- print.html: "A disruptive innovation is a technologically simple innovation in the form of a product, service, or business model that takes root in a tier of the market that is unattractive to the established leaders in an industry. Very often this occurs at the low end of a market -- that is how Toyota attacked General Motors, for example. Or it takes root by providing a simple and inexpensive product that enables a new population of customers to begin participating in a new application in the market -- as was the case with personal computers"
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








