[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Traditional RPC

• To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Traditional RPC
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:29:47 -0800
• Thread-index: AcG49RK8/8CmATjgT4au0gOsEIoaUgAAF0lQ
• Thread-topic: Traditional RPC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@u...] 
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:25 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Traditional RPC
> 
> 
> >if I were faced with two different offerings for web
> > services, one based on RPC-style transactions and one
> > based on the web architecture
> 
> Just use whatever suits your mood.
> 
> Look at it this way -- if the court hadn't killed Napster, I 
> have no doubt we'd be using their protocol to do web 
> services, not SOAP or XML-RPC.
> 
> Think about that!

If the Napster protocol is so fantastic why aren't we using it for Web
Services? 

AOL officially prevented Nullsoft from working on Gnutella but this
hasn't stopped the protocol, clients and servers from living on.
Probably the only hype worse than the Java & XML hype was the irrational
furore around P2P. 

-- 
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #34
I will not turn into a snake. It never helps.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Traditional RPC
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Traditional RPC
    • From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Next by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: Re: Traditional RPC
• Next by thread: Re: Traditional RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread